Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!
literature
![spleenfiend's picture spleenfiend's picture](/exchange//files/images/SerendipStudioAvatar.png)
genre lines: never rigid
The evolutionary model is often mentioned in the context of the evolution of genre. As I read Owens' essay, I was reminded of something I read about evolution itself - that humans only see themselves as a drastically different species because all the intermediate species between humans and monkeys are extinct. When considering every species that has ever existed, classification is much more difficult because things that seem very defined start to run into each other. Humans have to search for patterns over long periods of time and then categorize them.
![jrlewis's picture jrlewis's picture](https://serendipstudio.org/exchange/files/pictures/picture-414.jpg)
Beyond the Nature of Genre
In their essays, both Owen and Dimock present persuasive arguments for the malleable, pliable nature of genre. The implications of this conception are taken up by Jeanette Winterson. She argues that the norms associated with genre facilitate greater creativity by authors. Referring to both Orlando and Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas, she writes that in “either case there is an immediate challenge to genre-boxing but there is to, an invitation to believe. To accept what will follow as truth and as the kind of truth only possible between people who know each other well… We can be taken in by someone who offers truth with a wink and says ‘I’m telling you stories. Trust me.”