Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!
Critical Issues in Education 2013
In the words of The Grateful Dead, "There is a road, no simple highway . . . "
Welcome to the online community conversation and resource space for Critical Issues in Education, an undergraduate Educational Studies course taught by Alice Lesnick at Bryn Mawr College as part of the Bryn Mawr/Haverford Education Program. This course is taught to honor the process of education as a road, no simple highway -- and as one we take and make together.
Our class will use this space for continuing dialogue, sharing relevant connections/links, and responding to reflective writings.
Please treat this space as a context for exploration, inquiry, and revision and participate in it with the care and respect such processes require.
Allison Zacarias Post 2
Allison Zacarias
Education 200
Professor Lesnick
February 20, 2013
Paper 2
The relationship between teaching and learning
There needs to be a relationship between students and teachers in order for there to exist a correct form of teaching and learning. A person can be labeled as a teacher simply because they have received the training for it but it does not mean that they know or are able to teach and have their students learn. Teaching is a learning experience where different skills are gained through the formation of relationships with students and the ability to learn from them. Freire says the following, “Whoever teaches learns in the act of teaching, and whoever learns teaches in the act of learning” (31). The way that relationships between students and teachers should form is through the acknowledgement that each person is an individual and should not be seen as a whole or as a generalized group. When teachers learn about and from their students they are able to realize that in order for the students to learn they need to teach their teachers about the way in which they learn.
Reflection #2
In Lareau’s Unequal Childhoods, she explores how children grow up and are treated differently because of class, gender, and sometimes race.
The middle class children all underwent concerted cultivation. Their language was nurtured by their parents. They were taught to shake hands, look people in the eye, and to expect others to bend to their way of thinking. Their parents were always involved in their packed lives, and often had to give up much of their own lives in order to fully cultivate them. Most of their lives were scheduled, and without organized activities, many of them felt lost.
The working class or poor children all were left to natural development. Vocal exchanges are always short and to the point, with little done to encourage the children’s growth in language. Many of them lived in places where they could not look people in the eye, and they were taught to respect what elders said. If a parent said, “Jump,” they are expected to reply with something along the lines of, “How high?”. For many of their parents, it is enough work to make sure they go to school, do homework, and have food in their bellies. Anything extra is extra work and hassle they do not want to deal with. They have much free time, and their creativity allows them to fill that time with games and activities they organize.
Paper #2
Looking toward my Field Placement with an Eye on Lareau
Annette Lareau analyzes the role of social factors in a child’s upbringing, but the main focus is social class. The crux of her argument is that middle class children have more “cultural capital” as a result of their class and the concerted cultivation method of upbringing that Lareau asserts is a defining feature of a middle class upbringing. As I head into my field placement, I wonder how Lareau’s study will rear its head in my experiences and observations. How present will class distinctions be at the Smith High School? What role will race play and how will the uncertainties that come with the issue of race be addressed by the school? Using Lareau’s lens, how much cultural capital do I think these students are attaining--or not attaining?
Maddy's Paper 2: Lareau Critique
Annette Lareau Perpetuates Inequality Rather than Helping the Issue
“America may be the land of opportunity, but it is also a land of inequality. This book identifies the largely invisible but powerful ways that parents’ social class impacts children’s life experiences” (Lareau, Kindle Locations 299-300).
Second Assignment
Lucy Carreno-Roca
February 19, 2013
Paper 2
An Insider looking Within: Analysis of Lareau’s Theoretical Approach
In Lareau’s Unequal Childhoods, she associates class, race, and gender as the key to a child’s educational experience and what they learn in the course of their life as they grow up to become citizens of the society that defined their learning and educational experiences. Through the information gathered in her research team’s field work, Lareau develops two constructs in which theoretically all middle and lower class fall into: a concerted cultivation experience or an accomplishment of natural growth experience. This either-or approach has many flaws but has helped lay some sort of ground work that can be built upon in future field work research that could potentially benefit the children of the United States in the long run. While reading this text, I felt as though there were many fundamental concepts that needed to be defined before truly diving into the field placement research. For example, the definition of lower class versus working class versus middle class is ambiguously established as this concept that defines a child’s potential and learning experience.
Critical Analysis of Freire
“I am a ‘conditioned’ being, capable of going beyond my own conditioning”
There were many times while I was reading The Pedagogy of Freedom, where I was nodding in agreement to many of the theoretical concepts discussed by Paulo Freire. The book may have seemed a bit excessive in really “hammering” the main points repeatedly, and some of the concepts could have benefited from more relatable examples to help the readers who struggled with abstractness of his thinking. However, personally I felt that the book really encompassed my perspectives on the pedagogy, duty and the responsibility of what it means to be a teacher.
A Critical Look at Lareau
Annette Lareau’s research for her book “Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life,” while obviously noteworthy and perhaps groundbreaking two decades ago, does pose some problems as we look at it today. Her choices to include certain participants and exclude others seem to be based solely on whether they could help her check off several boxes that she prescribed for her study. She needed to have a selection of cases where each child was a unique mix of two possibilities for gender, race, and class. This method made it easy for Lareau to classify middle class families into a tactic of concerted cultivation, and working and lower class families into the strategy of accomplishment of natural growth. This is frustrating, because it seems to be much too narrow of a focus, much too literally black and white to really presume to be truly applicable to the larger population. By ignoring factors outside of the strict dichotomy of lower/working and middle class and white and Black, Lareau limits the amount of significance that can be extrapolated from her work.
Notes from class
February 12th, 2013
How do you know the difference between abuse and discipline?
Abuse vs. Discipline
Abuse |
Discipline |
excessive, beating, more force duration. long term, issues external to the child, impulsive, can it be cultural, less related to child, child cannot learn the system it is too arbitrary |
washing mouth out with soap, modify behaviors, hit spank, rational, no conflict across cultural setting-school/home/ grocery, varies by gender, child can learn system and succeed, rational lecturing explaining why |
types of Discipline:
- Threats
- writing lines
- spanking
Similarities?
cyclical/cultural
Traditional vs. Progressive Discipline
Current Events
In class it has been mentioned that current events have not really been integrated into our classes. So here is a debate going related to education.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/19/education/gym-class-isnt-just-fun-and-games-anymore.html?hp&_r=0
Critical Assessment of Lareau
Lareau states her theoretical perspectives regarding the inequality of education and educational institutions which encompasses different philosophies of child rearing, psychology, and socioeconomic standings and their correlation to each other. According to Lareau, middle class families tend to employ the concerted cultivation approach, while lower income families tend to employ the accomplishment of natural growth approach. She seeks to prove how concerted cultivation leads to a sense of entitlement in children while the accomplishment of natural growth leads to a sense of constraint. Although Lareau attempts to validate both approaches, she notes the significant advantage of the concerted cultivation approach and how it prepares the student for the inevitable life ahead of dealing with the masses of faceless institutions (and how this advantage automatically places others at a disadvantage). While I feel Lareau's theories hold some truth, I find her approach extremely reactionary and her study blind to the other causes of disadvantages in the classroom. In many cases, her observations are skewed to fit her theory and her attempt to distinguish her theory as binary in nature often leaves out the dynamic aspect of family lives, child-rearing methods, and situations. Because of this, the significance of her theory is stunted.
Paper Two
Jayah Feliciano
February 18, 2013
Paper 2
Theoretical Analysis Reflection
In Lareau’s text, she focuses on low/working and middle class families and the impact that their way of living has on the offspring. She states that middle class families engage in concerted cultivation as opposed to the low/working class families who prefer natural growth for their children. Lareau believes that the children raised in the middle classes families gain more of advantage than the children in low/working class families, and I agree with Lareau.
Chapter three is about a boy, Garret Tallinger, who is raised in a middle class family. Organized sports are a top priority for him and they shape Garret to be competitive, aggressive, and teach him how to work with a team. In addition to sports, his parents use a technique of answering questions with more questions to arrive at an answer. They also teach Garret how to interact with adults, making sure he gives eye contact when shaking the hand of an adult. The parents of Alexander Williams, who is also middle class, makes sure that he questions authority.
Post #2: Culture
McDermott and Varenne define culture as a term “that is generally taken to gloss the well-bound containers of coherence that mark off different kinds of people living in their various ways, each kind separated from the others by a particular version of coherence, a particular way of making sense and meaning,” (325). Reading McDermott and Varenne’s article on culture, and focusing on the wording of how they defined culture in the beginning--by emphasizing on "separating" people and identifying differences in one another-- I am curious as to how their perspectives would apply in the setting of my field placement at a school with students who have learning differences, as they call it.
Reflection Paper #2
After reading Freire’s perspective on teaching and learning, and their relationship and dichotomies, I think it is fair to say that he has offered the reader a romanticized and idealistic version of a classroom and the dynamic that exists between teachers and students. He also presents a fairly isolated view of the classroom, only slightly taking into account the background and family lives of students. This highly contrasts to the writing of McDermott & Varenne, seeing how there is not as much of an insistence on the importance of the individual, but rather the teaching methodologies and practices in and around the classroom. He is much more optimistic about the future; a quote that stuck with me in relation to this was,”I am not angry with people who think pessimistically. But I am sad because for me they have lost their place in history” (Freire 26). I struggle to put this in context of his argument for critical thinking in the classroom and critical analysis of teaching by teachers. It seems a little contradictory to me that he is so anti-pessimistic, yet looks for criticism. I do not mean to equate pessimism and criticism, but being blindly optimistic about the future does not leave much room for critical thinking, whether constructive or not.
"Right Thinking"
The practice of right thinking, according to Freire, is grounded in a number of factors, one of which includes teaching by example. When teachers engage in right thinking they are open to multiple answers, and are able to acknowledge and respect the autonomy and lived experiences of their students. Right thinking stands in opposition to the banking system of education because it recognizes that education is not the transferring of knowledge but the wonder of curiosity and discovery. In describing right thinking, Freire emphasized the importance of leading by example by saying “right thinking is right doing”, but what does it mean for educators to teach by example? How are authorities responsible for fostering right thinking?
article of interest re: Lareau
This Wall Street Journal article, called Family, Inc., is about families using approaches from the business world to structure homelife -- complete with family mission statements and meetings. A new take on concerted cultivation??
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323452204578288192043905634.html
Class notes week 3
February 5, 2013
- learner is an active agent
effort and ability--->authority ----->merit and privilege --->conceded cultivation---->accomplishment or? natural growth
questions of structure
and freedom
What is missing from this?
- expectations/rituals (at home or at school)
- intrinsic/extrinsic
- different cultural logics
- is it black or white? literally?
- to much stress in saying why it is important
- came from different experiences of school and class
- Can we generalize by class? Lareau say it is
- all educative experiences but the payoff is different in our society
Other ideas from the Lareau
Educational Journey (Take 2)
Reflective Writing in Response Groups #1
Critical Issues in Education
Table of Contents
- Learning in the Island
- The Great Escape: Immigrating to the United States
- The Trouble with the Accent
- Girls Inc.
- Propellers: The Role of Mentors
- Posse
- Bryn Mawr
II. The Great Escape: Immigrating to the United States
Education Autobiography
Chapter 1 – The Big Move
Chapter 2 – Teacher Bound Upward Bound
Chapter 3 – You won’t make it to Harvard
Chapter 4 – Let’s take Harvard and Yale off Your List (They might be too far of a reach)
Chapter 5 – Education not Deportation/ Save Our Schools
Chapter 6 – Posse
Chapter 7 – So This is What Being the “Minority” in College Feels Like
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 4 – Let’s take Harvard and Columbia off Your List (They might be too far of a reach)