Accessibility in feminist literature

First off I wanted to say thank you for your response to the post. I realize this is a late response, I was not sure what I wanted to write and in honor of crip time I wanted to wait until I had something that I felt was truthful about what I believed. I agree that by making feminist literature less accessible it breeds elitism. If feminism is about choice and the belief that women are not the other than making it less accessible seems to be an issue. There are times when I’ve talked to people when I’ve had to simplify and make the theories more concise to get people to consider them. If I handed them a complex essay on theory they may be less inclined to actually understand it and that is a detriment to feminism. It is not that feminist literature cannot be accessible but it’s that it doesn’t make it any less feminist if it is accessible.  Over the time that I posted my view and reading your response I do think that feminist literature should be more accessible. The pros outweigh the cons in this case. I was having a hard time figuring out the balance but I feel having feminist literature be this way allows others to participate in the discussion and gain more viewpoints. At the time of my post we had read Persepolis, which I view to be an extremely accessible work of feminist literature and since then I have read other pieces that are not as much. I enjoyed these works but I also had the help of a class and serendip to help understand the meaning. It is not that making a piece of feminist literature less accessible makes it less of a feminist work but I don’t think that it is one of the tenants of feminism. Again thank you for your response and it has helped me figure out this aspect to feminism that I was having great difficulty with.