Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Class summary for day 3

Riki's picture

On Day 3, "Natural Born Cyborgs,"
We first watched the Selarc video, which mentioned the idea of the body as a sculptural medium and an evolutionary architecture. Many people in the class seemed disturbed and/or intrigued by the art. Thinning the boundary between self and other makes us feel existentially uncomfortable.

We reflected on our initial postings and the Clark reading:

  • technology is more simplistic than we might first assume -- for example, we usually think of computers, but simple tools like pens are also technology
  • where is agency located? You can't completely blame technology for your actions... shared agency?
  • a relationship with technology is driven by desire/intention; no one is being forced to use a cell phone
  • we are wired to create interpersonal relationships with our environment
  • there is a prejudice about technology separating people
  • is the use of technology really a biological desire or just social programming? This brings about the nature-nurture debate, which is just another boundary that needs to be blurred

Clark's argument:

  • he tries to redefine the cartoon image of a cyborg
  • he encourages us to accept and embrace ourselves as natural-born cyborgs

Thinking points and metaphors:

  • Clark explains that as a species, we have been using technology for a long time
  • full-integration with technology in the future
  • we already have extended cognition into technology -- for example, feeling disabled when your computer breaks
  • the body is a "fortress" designed to be breached

Adaptation and evolutionary psychology:

  • Clark tries to argue against evopsych -- it's not relevant or helpful to talk about our behavior in relation to hunter/gatherers
  • adaptation as an active feedback loop? Perhaps our capacity to adapt increases as more technology is present
  • as we create new technology, we are creating ourselves
    • ethical choices about what to create?

Back to class thoughts on Clark...

  • Clark doesn't seem to discuss the downsides of embracing our cyborg nature
  • if we don't have to remember things now (i.e. phone numbers), will that impair our ability to remember details later in life?
  • connectivity brings burdens -- example: parents thinking you're dead if you don't answer your phone for a few hours
  • is the act of rejecting technology unnatural?
  • does "natural" refer to the biological world or the social world?
  • by naming our technology, we make it a part of us
    • does this mean it's natural for us to want to connect to everything?
  • union of body + technology = scaffolding

Haraway vs. Clark:

  • Haraway wrote her article to model her thesis -- she has a political agenda; she wants to challenge and change the way we think
  • Clark doesn't seem to be challenging us, just trying to prove his point
  • Haraway's writing is more timeless and allows for multiple interpretations
  • Clark's writing could easily be outdated


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.