Play in the City 2013

Zadie Smith’s NW mulls over how our neighborhood, clan, and race affects the path your life takes. None of the main characters are satisfied with how their lives turned out, even if in society’s view, their lives turned out rather well. They all feel various degrees of agency to do something about it. While I was reading the book on the Amtrak back to Bryn Mawr, I started thinking about where their biology fits into their predicaments. By biology, I mean how and why their brains are wired. For example, if Leah is wired to have a deficit of agency, is it still her fault? 

As mentioned today in class, we'd like you (please) to consult your calendars,
and come to class next Tuesday able to tell us when you are free to attend
the Nicole Canuso performance of The Garden--
possibilities include 7:30 & 9 p.m. on Fris, Nov. 1, Nov. 8, Nov. 15,
6 & 7:30 & 9 p.m. on Sats, Nov. 2, Nov. 9, Nov. 16
4:30 & 6 pm. on Suns, Nov. 3, Nov. 10, Nov. 17
6 & 7:30 on Mons, Nov. 4, Nov. 11
7:30 & 9 on Thurss, Nov. 7, Nov. 14.

Also we'd like to know if you could be free and available to fulfill Mark's fantasy of a final gathering of us all,
@ the same time, in a special place, for a special meal and conversation, in the city on December 6-8?

Thanks!

A&M

Every so often, throughout my reading of NW, a sentence or phrase would jump out at me, and I’d underline it. When I finished the book, I typed up and compiled all these sentences into one document and sorted them into themes. One of the themes I found has to do with economic concepts, and because in my other classes I am dealing a lot with economics and economic theory, I’d be interested in applying theories of human economic thought and behaviour into analysing the characters of NW. I have five main quotes of sentences from the book, and I plan to focus on the closely surrounding passages from which they come to see how much depth I can to the characters in terms of their participation in the economic system, both in the city and globally. I want to explore how consideration of these characters (and upon reflection, ourselves in real life) in terms of their economic function can serve to reorient the reader’s perception of their emotional, social, romantic, and/or familial behaviour.

I want to focus on the different vision from Leah and Michel.It's interesting that they have a different consideration,different race and not loving each other but still like to be with each other. Leah wants to stay eighteen, but Michel is hoping to move to the next step. Their marriage is between two totally different spirit---- one longing for freedom needs no boundary and one well-planned.When I read about Leah, I thought she would not be someone needs marriage, like other normal women. She seems to have a spirit that wants something more. And Michel is a good-looking man that every woman would like, he can easily find someone suits him better than Leah. I want to find the reason of their marriage---what are they expecting out of this marriage. Even it led to a tragedy because they want different things, it should not meant to be a total mistake.

When reading NW, and even more so when we discussed it in class, I found myself very intrigued by the structures Zadie Smith choose to use throughout the book. To break a mold and rebuild it is in some ways astonishing to me, and she certainly explored what it meant to be a chapter, a section, a dialogue. Some of her chapters were numbered while others were named or mis-numbered. She did not use quotation marks of any sort, some of her descriptions were stream-of-consciousness focus on one thing or another, and some of her chapters were made up entirely of google map directions, or a web page, or stream-of-consciousness senses along a certain path. I would love to explore in more depth the tools she uses, and where and why she might use them.

As I was reading NW, I found myself most invested with the character and storyline of Keisha/Natalie. I felt that the discontinuity and split personality of Keisha/Natalie mimicked the structure of the novel NW, which I also saw as a unit that did not have any clear direction, or a real sense of what it was. I would like to take a deeper look into how Keisha/Natalie’s different identities interact, and how although Natalie desperately tries to escape where she is from and her background, Keisha is still always with her. I would also like to see how the structure of her section of the novel is reminiscent of the structure of her life and the novel as a whole, but I think that may be too much to do well and fit into a three-page paper.

The fragmented stories of the four main characters in NW perplexed me. The book is composed of fragmented words and scenes. And none of the characters have a happy ending, which is what we typically see in novels or movies. The book is not like a mosaic that put broken things together as a whole, but let broken things staying broken. Why does Zadie Smith set the book this way and what does she trying to say or show? Another thing I noticed is fate associated with roots. Natalie, or Keisha, tries to leave her root behind but somewhat still can't shake it off. She leads a perfect life by pretending to be someone else but . In the opposite, Felix accepts his roots and turns into a better person, but he dies. Is this because their fate will follow them no matter what they do or who they become? Is it pointless to try to get out of the poverty they were born into since their roots will follow them along the way? 

I'm interested in the difference between Leah and Natalie. Leah has spent her whole life going against what was expected of her: she did next to nothing with her college degree, is living in a home worse than the one she grew up in, is deciding not to have children. Natalie, on the other hand, has spent her life doing only what was expected of her: went to college, got an excellent job, lives in a nice house, has a family. Leah, however, appears to be more happy with where she is than Natalie. Why is this? This is made more interesting when we take into account the fact that they grew up together and were best friends...many of the things they did, they did together.