Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Reply to comment

vgaffney's picture

Mid-Semester Evaluation

 Looking Backwards—

So far I’ve found many aspects of the class to be quite productive. As someone who is not as comfortable participating (especially in a large classroom) I have found the dialogue structure to be very helpful. I think the way the class is conducted overall in terms of discussion is working quite well and have found the on-line postings surprisingly engaging and worthwhile. Individually, I feel I should work more on participating in the discussions within the classroom, but I do feel I’ve gained a lot from the both the in class and online discussions.

As a group I think the discussions are generally effective in getting the majority of the class to participate. I think sometimes too much time is spent on business at the very beginning of class which can make the start of a conversation seem a bit forced or rushed. I realize that business is important and relevant, but perhaps maybe this process could be sped up a bit at the beginning of class. I thought the panels were very engaging, but could have been a bit more structured which would have allowed for a more directed discussion, possibly making it even more productive.

I’ve learned a good deal individually through the combination of readings and class discussions. As a group I think everyone in the class has gained a lot from hearing their peers’ opinions on the material covered in the readings and class.

Looking Forwards—

There is definitely a good deal more to learn within the domains of gender, information, science and technology, and the intersections. I would be interested in looking more at scientific advancements and their various implications for gender and other aspects of society. Although very lengthy, I am intrigued by the book Godel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter. Perhaps the class could read a few excerpts. The author himself calls the book: "a metaphorical fugue on minds and machines in the spirit of Lewis Carroll", which instantly reminded me of this class. From what I know of the book there’s a really interesting structure which employs metaphorical language and touches on a variety of related issues in computer science, cognitive science, and philosophical thought. I’m also fairly certain there’s an interesting discussion on gender near the beginning of the book. 

 

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.