Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!
Reply to comment
This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities
Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.
Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)
What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio
Recent Group Comments
-
skindeep
-
Ameneh
-
Ameneh
-
Ameneh
-
Ameneh
-
Ameneh
-
eledford
-
Evren
-
ln0691
-
ln0691
Recent Group Posts
A Random Walk
Play Chance in Life and the World for a new perspective on randomness and order.
New Topics
-
12 hours 10 min ago
-
18 hours 25 min ago
-
18 hours 31 min ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
2 weeks 4 days ago
It really disconcerts me that
It really disconcerts me that education kind of pushes us away from body knowledge and into the realm of "disembodied intelligence." I'm not trying to prioritize body over mind and, as someone who does not dance or perform, I can't say that I have a lot of knowledge in that area but it seems a shame to completely disregard the "thing that carries our heads."
The idea of disembodied intelligence reminds me a lot of the discussions that I had in a class on sociology and medicine last year. The idea of a body as a machine, as something that is fallible: if it breaks, you go to a mechanic (a doctor), and you replace the joint or change the oil. It can get sick. It can fail.
But consciousness always seemed to prevail, even when the organ system (the nervous system) that seems to provide consciousness failed or "broke." Pure knowledge, pure intelligence, pure thought. It is valued above kinesthetic ability, like dance and drama or art and music or sports.
But kinesthetic ability is very important and there's no reason that you can't combine body knowledge and "disembodied knowledge," aside from the fact that you would have to stop placing certain values between them. Like I said in class, a dancer might make a better chemist or surgeon than a mathematician who sits all day (which isn't to say that that is what all mathematicians do, but for the sake of argument)... But that is only if the dancer also has the knowledge and the know-how of chemistry or surgery.
Ken Robinson talked about needing to "move to think." I don't think we live (or should live) in such a world where one can only be a dancer OR a mathematician. Needing to move to think does not cancel out someone's desire to do something more "disembodied." Wouldn't it be more effective to be both? Especially, as we referenced in class, when there's some kind of cultural or socioeconomic shift and we need other professions than doctor, lawyer, engineer?