Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Reply to comment

alesnick's picture

confidence in successive reductions

As one of the people who struggles with breaking problem down into smaller things then building them back up, I think way of naming the problem (not as engagement with "math" or "science" but rather imaginative suspension of resolution without losing track of that which we seek to resolve).  For me, it's important to get farther to a sense purpose (not necessarily, or even primary, practical relevance, which I often find a rather boring, scolding appeal -- like, I don't really care about the design of elevators or the lift airplanes) -- of import -- what is at stake in thought -- than is often clear to me.  And the smaller and smaller bits also come across to me as dry as a bone.  Too sheer, no handholds.  I want handholds that are meaning-oriented, not thing- or process- or achievement-oriented. 

 

 

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.