Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Home › Bio 103, Week 9 ›

Reply to comment

Terrible2s's picture

Terrible2s, Ktan,Vdonely, Lili

Submitted by Terrible2s on Mon, 11/09/2009 - 11:45am.

Today in class we were talking about the validity of our conversation about macro/micromolecules and what suggestions we had to make it better. Our group had a few suggestions/comments:

-We feel that it's boring, but somehow very important as well
-we suggest that we read about the basics on our own then discuss rather than learning about them fully in class
-we also recommended that we learn about it in class as a crash course (perhaps outlining what we've read) and not delve too deep into the material
-we felt that the class seems more to be about actual application of things in the world and observations/self exploration
-We suggest this unit be perhaps connected to real life thing
-We therefore said that because we take little interest in this we do not find it necessary to be "less wrong" about it
-Lastly, we found it to be more of a chemistry topic than one that should be thoroughly explored in Biology 103

Reply

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
18 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities

Scanning electron microscope image of SARS-CoV-2

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.

Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)

What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio