Reply to comment

I disagree with some of your points.  I think the initial examination of a phenomenom will result is vastly different stories, as with the ant.  However I think that the stories were constantly changing by listening and evaluating other people's stories, and through the "experiments" of repeated observations, observations over time, and observations made by changing the factors of the simulation.  Given more time and more tools (perhaps the ability to slow down the simulation), I think we could have collectively arrived at the "truth".