Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Online Conversations

ashley's picture

I am very excited about this course and the potential for great dialogue that it has thus portrayed. We have various means of communication, which I think is important to suit the needs of different learners and for the different ways that people express themselves. At the same time, I do have my concerns about the Twitter component. What irked me the first couple of tweets I posted was that the character limit would inevitably cut me off before I had finished saying what I wanted to say. It reminds me of the multitude of literacies we have discussed and will continue discussing throughout the semester. A new (for the newbies to Twitter as myself), different type of literacy is necessary when communicating via Twitter. You are not able to talk in long drawn out thoughts, but rather it teaches you, or more so requires you, to be succinct and to find the shortest and most effective way to express your thought. I have yet to make up my mind about how I feel about this aspect of social media, but I will say that I am interested in seeing how the combination and interweaving of Twitter and Serendip will play out, where in one you post short statements or links to articles, the other requires you to expand on your thoughts and lay them out in a more thought-out manner. It might just end up being the perfect balance between these two types of thinking and expressing oneself, lending itself to a constructive class dialogue.

Comments

alesnick's picture

usefully intersecting constraints on dialogue?

I wonder how your sense of the limitation of the 140 characters will shift as you grow familiar with/adept at Twitter.  You may feel the sense of constraint and requirement less as you grow comfortable revising in Twitter to make space for more words.  And yes, I think it will be fascinating to explore the interplay of our Twitter and Serendip dialogues  . . . and the different social contexts of each.