Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!
Reply to comment
Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities
Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.
Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)
What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio
Recent Group Comments
-
Serendip Visitor (guest)
-
rohit kumar (guest)
-
randhir kumar (guest)
-
Serendip Visitor (guest)
-
Anne (guest)
-
Florinda LG (guest)
-
omar (guest)
-
Chris Clauser (guest)
-
rain (guest)
-
Crystal Leonard
Recent Group Posts
A Random Walk
Play Chance in Life and the World for a new perspective on randomness and order.
New Topics
-
13 hours 57 min ago
-
20 hours 12 min ago
-
20 hours 18 min ago
-
1 week 3 days ago
-
2 weeks 4 days ago
One thing that really
One thing that really bothers me about this whole controversy, and scientific funding in general, is the fact that Dr. Wakefield received money that could have, and possibly did, skew his results. Society has lots of corrupt individuals, who put their own personal motives before any ethical concerns they may have. However, science is supposed to be based on evidence. Unfortunately, scientists like Dr. Wakefield are making things more difficult for everyone else due to their fabricated results and corrupt motivations. While I don't think a scientific code of ethics will prevent all corruption, I do believe that it will make a significant difference. I also feel that by making funding more available, scientists would be less tempted to receive their funding by less than ethical means. Possibly by allowing scientists a little more leeway as to the funding of their research, while still instituting a code of ethics, will not only discourage scientists from acting unethically, but possibly remove the temptation to begin with.