Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Home › The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ›

Reply to comment

Paul Grobstein's picture

The DSM and its revision

Submitted by Paul Grobstein on Sun, 11/07/2010 - 2:17pm.

"Is this new edition, the DSM-V, really needed and how valid and reliable is it and past manuals?"

My sense is that there are two at least somewhat distinct questions here.  One is the pros and cons of a DSM type manual, and the other is whether proposed revisions of the existing manual will make it in some ways better than it has in the past.  I have to admit I'm a little skeptical on both counts, given the ways usage of the DSM has evolved over the years since its first appearance. 

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities

Scanning electron microscope image of SARS-CoV-2

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.

Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)

What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio