Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Home › BBI 2007 Session 7 ›

Reply to comment

Paul Grobstein's picture

to think more about ....

Submitted by Paul Grobstein on Thu, 07/12/2007 - 9:20am.

Two (of a LOT) of the questions/ideas that came up this morning that seem to me worth thinking more (a LOT more) about ...

Are kids who get through 12 years of school more successful in later life because of things they got during those twelve years, or are they kids who already have things that both help them complete 12 years of school AND be successful in later life?

Do we want "success in later life" to be our criterion for successful education? It presumes that we think culture/society (what kids are going into) is the way we want it to be. Maybe we should define successful education as that which enables kids to be meaningful changers of society/culture in later life?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
12 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities

Scanning electron microscope image of SARS-CoV-2

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.

Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)

What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio