Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!
Reply to comment
Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities
Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.
Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)
What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio
Recent Group Comments
-
alesnick
-
Richard L Stover (guest)
-
alesnick
-
Anne Dalke
-
alesnick
-
Paul Grobstein
-
Paul Grobstein
-
Paul Grobstein
-
alesnick
-
bolshin
Recent Group Posts
A Random Walk
New Topics
-
1 week 5 days ago
-
1 week 5 days ago
-
1 week 5 days ago
-
5 weeks 1 day ago
-
5 weeks 2 days ago
The How and the What
I resonate with gift giving inAlice 's sense and dissing in Anne's sense. These seem to me essential to an atmosphere of openness and growth, and togetherness. And what a wonderful atmosphere that is! Their posts bring up issues of "how" we should or might want to engage with each other and what the spirit of our interactions can be.
I have been thinking about "what" our interactions are about. It seems to me that we have been resisting or avoiding this issue of the content of our group (or is it only that it hasn't come up yet?).
Can a person or a group think or act without standing for something? Can thinking and acting happen independently of commitments and power structures? I think the answer is no. (It seems to me that this is one of the powerful lessons from feminism, queer theory and post-colonial studies... as well as Feyerabend, Foucault and Rorty … and of course others).
So when we gather in a room or talk on the web, which commitments and structures are we for and which against? What is the group for? What is it trying to achieve? Without addressing these issues, it seems to me like the group might drift rather than emerge (a valid distinction?).
“Against” can be taken as how or what. Taken as how (againsthow), it is angry, angst-ridden, disempowered, opponents as enemies. Taken as what (againstwhat), it is progress, clarity, empowerment and standing up for what one values.
Sontag and Feyerabend mix together againsthow and againstwhat. They are not only against something (interpretation, method), but they are against it in a dismissive, annoyed way. Stallybrass seems to have less of the againsthow.
Can we avoid altogether the againsthow while bringing more to the surface the againstwhat? That is, can we be joyful, playful, gleeful while standing resolutely for something beautiful, good, important and difficult to achieve?
In fact, I wonder if joyfulness and playfulness come from the ease of conscience from knowing that one is standing for the right things.