Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Home › Neurobiology and Behavior, Week 1 ›

Reply to comment

shikha's picture

sitting on the fence

Submitted by shikha on Mon, 01/26/2009 - 3:45am.

Between the two theories, I am going to choose to sit on the fence for now. While Dickinson's theory that everything is a construct of our brain and that brain = behavior is quite appealing to me, I find it hard to believe that our behavior is a result of only the interaction of molecules. I'd like to think that there is something other than the brain that controls our behavior. Otherwise would we not behave for the sole purpose of reward? How does altruism play into this? How can something like morality simply be a result of firing neurons? However, could all these be emergent qualities of the interactions between molecules?

I cannot decide which theory I believe in more and am curious to know where I'll stand in May.

Reply

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
9 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities

Scanning electron microscope image of SARS-CoV-2

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.

Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)

What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio