Reply to comment

The problem that I have with many of these studies, showing that the male and female brain are constructed and think differently, is that they push to find a correlation. As we have concluded from class, these conclusions and correlations are not so simply understood. The complexity lies in, what Professor Grobstein brought up as, a continuous spectrum of sexuality and gender. Not only do these studies base their results on male versus female, as two distinct categories, they do not consider the intermediate area between those women that are more male, and those men that are more female. Like was discussed in class, the science is bias to the societal view of male and female as being two distinct non-overlapping categories. I think that the science cannot be completely accurate until these social biases are dissolved. To make conclusions, I think that scientists use their preconceived notions regarding gender to influence their conclusions about male and female. I think it is important to understand that the science is run by dichotomous categories. I agree with Rebecca that the sex binary is not completely bad, but I think it plays a negative role in science. Socially, the clear division of the sexes is a reality, but in science I think that the gendered spectrum can be explored and can yield more concrete results about gender differences.