Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Home › Nervous system architecture: from the output side II ›

Reply to comment

Nelly Khaselev's picture

Hmm...maybe not?

Submitted by Nelly Khaselev on Wed, 03/26/2008 - 9:52pm.
Couldn't your I function though also be controlled or affected by corollary discharge? This would prevent someone from concluding that the I function is a conductor. After all the I function is still just another box in our nervous system. Perhaps the people who can walk across hot rocks are those with special corollary discharges in parts of their nervous system, so they don’t feel the pain and are able to walk across. Plus, although I completely agree that therapy can help people with anxiety, anorexia and other disorders, if the therapy does not fix the corollary discharge break or confusion then the problem cannot go away (assuming the these disorders are indeed controlled by something going wrong in the corollary discharge of the NS). If the I function was truly the conductor of pain or these disorders wouldn't it be much easier to help those with disorders. Why do some people respond to therapy better than others? and some not at all?

Reply

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
3 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities

Scanning electron microscope image of SARS-CoV-2

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.

Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)

What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio