Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Home › Bio 103, Lab 8: Onself as a Biological Entity. III. Thinking ›

Reply to comment

Catrina Mueller's picture

yaa tsi tsup ari dik ari dull an dik ari dill an dits tan dool..

Submitted by Catrina Mueller on Wed, 11/07/2007 - 3:03pm.

This first time around, the results of our Thinking Time correlated with the rest of the class.

Catrina:

Act: 240

Think: 95

Read: 92

Negate: 24

Kate:

Act: 232

Think: 62

Read: 134

Negate: -28

The negative number occurs here because Kate could negate faster than she could read. This suggests that reading and negating are not correlated.

The second time around we decided to listen to LEEKSPIN, leekspin.com, a funny... song.

Our hypothesis was that, while listening to a long repetitive song, the time it took to think would increase.

Catrina:

Act: 237

Think:49

Read: 98

Negate: 25

Kate:

Act: 271

Think: 41

Read: 100

Negate: -18

The data suggests that there's really no notable difference between our control times and our LEEKSPIN times. Listening to a long, repetitive song had no effect on how fast we thought.

This could be because our brains were able to tune out LEEKSPIN and concentrate on the tests.

Reply

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
6 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities

Scanning electron microscope image of SARS-CoV-2

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.

Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)

What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio