October 6, 2014 - 15:14
Undeniably, like all the passages we have read mentioned, play can help develop social skills, explore imagination and have so many other benefits. However, at the same time, play is also riskful and limited.
Given that play is riskful, should we then put a limit on play? And where should the limit be? Some parents don’t allow kids to fight with each other in case they hurt themselves. However, some experts said that kids can learn from getting hurt: know how to avoid being hurt next time, feel empathy toward wounded people and won’t intentionally hurt others since he/she has had the same kind of feeling. And often the truth is the more you get hurt the more you learn. Then, could it be said that parents should encourage children to fight with each other? There definitely should be a boundary between play and violent.
Moreover, beside all the risk of being hurt, there are also regulations and obligations that prevent people from doing whatever they want which also put limits on play. That’s why the passage ‘Playing in industrial ruins’ regard industrial ruins as an ideal place to play – because of its lack of surveillance and regulation.
For all the reasons, it’s easy to find that play is not as free as people used to think of it. However, all these limits can only be put on physical play and no one can ever define a limit for mental play, just like nobody can control others thoughts and imagination.