Voices from Participants in the 2000 Conference
All anonymous quotations that appear below are drawn from various forums in "Talking toward Techno-Pedagogy: A Collaboration across Colleges and Constituencies." Bryn Mawr College, May, 2000.
They have been
excerpted from "Unrolling Roles in Techno-Pedagogy: Toward New Forms of Collaboration
in Traditional College Settings", by Alison Cook-Sather, Bryn Mawr College.
The complete article is in Innovative Higher Education, volume 26, number
2, 2001.
"I've had professors
that did everything in PowerPoint and I slept through the whole class. Then
I'd have professors that have strictly lectured and it was the best class I'd
ever had. So it's all about teaching style and you have to learn what works
best for each student involved. But technology is not necessarily the greatest
thing on earth." (Student Participant, Day 2, morning)
"People will come and participate and take risks in a
'virtual reality' that they wouldn't take in the real world, but then get enough
confidence to take the risk in the actual reality." (Facilitators' Debriefing,
May 25, 2000)
"[I]t was useful to have concentrated time to think through
different people's roles." (Information Technologist, Final Feedback Form)
"[People] that I have never seen on campus" [could begin
to talk]." (Librarian, Final Feedback Form)
"As a member of computing services it becomes so easy
to function solely within the confines of our day to day maintenance of the
critical college functions that I find I do not focus on the components of technology
that really enhance the curricular mission of our institution. What has inspired
me most over the past few days is the understanding that viewing the faculty/library/IT/student
groups as a team - we can work together to create opportunities to use technology
in a more integral fashion in a way that empowers all the players, and ultimately
enriches the student experience." (Information Technologist, Feedback, Day 3)
"...myths and stereotypes were broken down." (Librarian,
Final Feedback Form)
"We have a much better understanding in my group of the
roles each person in the group and of the value of collaboration." (Student,
Final Feedback Form)
"Sometimes you're talking to a professor and maybe it's
registering but sometimes it's in one ear. [But here] maybe they thought they
could actually benefit from this…that they were going to be better teachers
or more fun in the classroom…I think there were many moments when [professors
realized that talking with a] student ahead of time saves you the anxiety of
planning a course that may or may not work. To realize that is a really liberating
thing and I think that happened for a couple of people and I don't think they
[had] imagined that as a possibility..." (Student, Final Feedback)
"We moved from roles of reactivity to proactivity." (Librarian,
Final Feedback)
"How can I access the student voice in planning?" (Information
Technologist, Final Feedback)
"The student participation…was really invaluable to me
as a faculty member because even though you have [course] evaluations, here
we are talking about this stuff and thinking about it and right there you've
got this sense of, well, no that's not going to work at all." (Professor, Day
4, morning)
"I realize that I'd rather have more student input about
what kind of resources they think are good." (Librarian, Day 4, morning)
"One of the things we were talking about too is creating
a course with the students…training them to do web development and web support
for faculty."
(Information Technologist, Day 4, afternoon)
"How can I get faculty to teach me about their teaching/research
goals instead of them just asking me to teach them about technology?" (Information
Technologist, Dinner, Day 1)
"Who has the authority to make suggestions to professors?"
(Information Technologist, Dinner, Day 1)